Purpose

The Georgia Tech data governance structure will assign and monitor accountabilities for Organizational Data to ensure proper use and handling. These accountabilities will be assigned to roles and committees listed in the Data Governance and Management Policy.

The Data Governance Committee is responsible for recommending policy, approving procedures, and providing guidance, direction, and support for data governance, management, security, and compliance efforts. This committee creates and maintains the governance structure and supports the defined roles, committees, and committee membership within the structure.

The Data Management Committee may be formed at a future date, either as a standing committee or one that is formed for targeted efforts. This committee will serve as a collective consciousness and intelligence for Organizational Data that span across Georgia Tech’s Data Domains. This committee will discover, research, and propose solutions for Institute-wide opportunities and issues related to Organizational Data.

The Data Domain and Technology Sub-Committees serve as a collective consciousness and intelligence for Organizational Data, business processes, service delivery, and Information System use within a Data Domain. These committees are responsible for decision making concerning substantive changes to Organizational Data and Information Systems within the Data Domain.

Georgia Tech’s technology governance structure works in close partnership with the data governance structure, providing a balanced focus between technology and data. Key stakeholders (e.g., CIO, CISO, Data Governance Officer) will have standing memberships across both structures to ensure consistent opportunities for collaboration. 

Related Guidelines, Procedures, and Resources

  • None

Definitions

Capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the same meaning as set forth in the Data Governance and Management Policy

Audience


Responsible
Data Governance Committee
Data Management Committee
Data Domain & Technology Subcommittees
AccountableData Owner
SupportData Governance team
ConsultedTechnology Governance Committee
InformedData User
Blank Space (medium)
(text and background only visible when logged in)
Blank Space (medium)
(text and background only visible when logged in)

Resources

USG BPM vs Georgia Tech's data governance structure

USG BPM Section 12Georgia Tech
Data Governance CommitteeData Governance Committee
 Data Management Committee 1
Functional Data Governance CommitteeData Domain & Technology Sub-Committees
Technical Data Governance CommitteeTechnology Governance Committee

Given Georgia Tech’s size and decentralized structure, adding a Data Management Committee layer may help bridge Data Domain & Technology Sub-Committees.
 

USG BPM vs. Georgia Tech's roles

USG BPM Section 12Georgia Tech
Data OwnerData Owner
Data TrusteeData Trustee
 Associate Data Trustee 1
Data StewardData Steward
Associate Data StewardAssociate Data Steward
 System Owner 2
 Technical Manager 2
 Data Administrator 2
Data UserData User

Due to Georgia Tech's size and complexity, adding an Associate Data Trustee will assist in supporting the responsibilities across Data Domains.
It is important to note data governance, management, security, and compliance efforts are a shared responsibility between functional roles that focus on data and technical roles that support the data through technology.

Data Domain & Technology Sub-Committees

Data DomainCommittee(s)
StudentSIS Governance (sub-committees include Planning, Technical Advisory)
FinanceFIN Governance (sub-committees include Business Owners, System Leads)
HRTBD
Blank Space (medium)
(text and background only visible when logged in)
Revision DateAuthorDescription
2022-01-10Zachary Hayes, Data GovernanceLink to Data Governance Committee page
2021-07-27Zachary Hayes, Data GovernanceNew
Blank Space (medium)
(text and background only visible when logged in)